THE SLAVERY
3. The date and origin of Slavery in the Romanian Principalties.
Slavery would be a form of social organization in Wallachia and
Moldavia. There would be Gypsy slaves in some regions of Transylvania
as well. On the coming of the first Gypsies to the Romanian principalties,
in the second half of the fourteenth century, slavery had already
been practiced there for some time. During the clashes between Romanians
and Tatars, the captured Tatars, or in the opinion of others, the
captured Tatars' slaves, were taken over into slavery by Romanians.
The sedentary Romanian population saw in these foreigners their
enemies and treated them exactly in the same way as they had treated
the Tatars. Since in fourteenth-fifteenth centuries these Gypsies
settled there in relatively great numbers, slavery became a sizable
phenomenon. In the fifteenth century the only slaves left would
be the Gypsies. The far less numerous Tatars would eventually melt
into this mass of Gypsy slaves; and the term of ţigan would
become the equivalent of slave.
4. The Categories of Slaves.
According their master and owner, the Gypsy slaves in the Romanian
principalties fell into three categories: the slaves owned by the
Prince or the State (domneşti), by the monasteries (mănăstireşti),
and by the boyards (boiereşti). For a long time, the Prince's
slaves (Gypsies) would be the most numerous by far. The Prince seems
to have been at least initially the sole owner of slaves. The slaves
of the monasteries come from donations to the monasteries by the
Prince and boyards. In various way the monasteries would come to
own a very large number of slaves(actually, thousands of them).
The boyards' slaves in their turn come from donations by the Prince,
direct purchase, inheritance, dowry and loot.
5. Ways of Life. Nomadism and Sedentarization. Marginality.
Their normal style of life was what distinguished the gypsies from
the majority of the population. In the first centuries after their
arrival in the Romanian principalties Gypsies were for their greater
part nomads. Most of the Gypsy slaves were allowed to ramble about
and make a living each by his "trade". In exchange for
this liberty they had to pay their masters a certain amount of money.
But nomad life in the case of the Gypsies should not be taken in
its strict sense, since the nomad Gypsies used to winter in one
place, on the estate of a feudal lord. Their traveling about in
summer always had a well established route. It so appears that nomad
life in their case was limited and controlled by the authorities,
rather then destructive and dangerous to society.
Undoubtedly the evolution of the Gypsy habitat took a sedentary
course, and the household chores and farming activities eventually
tied the Gypsies to a certain place.
The stark contrast between the two societies, the rural Romanian
one and of the Gypsies, subsisted for a long time. Despite the established
economic relations between the peasants and the Gypsies, the two
communities remained apart, each governed by its own set of rules.
Time would somehow fill this gap, with the increased bondage of
the peasants and the slow settling down of the Gypsies. This later
process would cause part of the Gypsy population to lose some of
its ethnic characteristics. The social changes in the condition
of the peasants and in the habitat of some of the privately owned
Gypsies favored the contacts between the two populations, and even
led to marriages between the Gypsies and the Romanians. A Romanian
marrying a Gypsy would automatically become a slave. During their
long centuries of slavery, the Gypsies hardly had any chance to
involve themselves with the Romanians. It is only after their emancipation
in the nineteenth century that part of the Gypsies became integrated
into the Romanian communities.
|