|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTALITARIANISM IN ROMANIA
|
|
|
II. THE NATIONAL IRON-GUARDIST STATE
- General Ion Antonescu would have wanted to co-operate with "historic"
parties but both the tsaranists and the liberals, faithful to
democratic principles, refused to join a dictatorial regime, convinced
of the final victory of England. Under such circumstances Ion
Antonescu brought the Iron Guard Legion into government, proclaiming
Romania a "national Iron-Guardist state". Hori Sima
became vice prime-Minister, while other representatives of the
Iron Guard took over the Ministries of External Affairs, National
Education, the Ministry of Labour, the Cults. The other portfolios
were assigned to military men and some technicians.
- The disagreement between Antonescu and the Iron-Guardists appeared
very quickly over the aim of increasing their sphere of power
and influence in the state. In fact there was a clash between
two ideologies and two different policies.
- Horia Sima was of the opinion that in economy also "the
accent had to fall upon the political element", that not
technocrats but the "new man" could build the society
of the future. The Legion thought that Antonescu was too tolerant
of the old structures, that he didn't destroy them and that he
did not establish a really totalitarian regime but one of political
dictatorship.
- The relationships between the two forces continuously deteriorated,
especially after the assassination in 1940 0f 64 prisoners, ex-officials,
officers and non-coms, for their involvement in the assassination
of Corneliu Zelea Codreanu. The historian Nicolae Iorga and the
economist Virgil Madgearu were assassinated in November too. These
crimes considerably contributed to criticism of the iron-guardist
movement.
- The iron-guardist movement in Romania set up not only the cult
of death but also the cult of personality. Horia Sima was presented
as "the one chosen by God
appointed for ever to take
our destiny in his hands and reinstate it in the history".
His portraits have mythical accents: "he has the appearance
of an angel and the sword of an archangel."
- Antonescu had called on German troops on 10th October and adhered
to the tripartite pact of 23rd of November after short visits
paid to Mussolini and Hitler. The Führer appreciated the
aggressive sharp personality of the leader more than that of his
uncertain iron-guardist rival. The abuses of the Iron-Guard made
the Führer view with an unfriendly eye its coming full power
in a country where for strategic and economic reasons he wanted
stability. Being pragmatic, the Nazis sacrificed their ideological
comrades in the end, preferring to put confidence in the army.
- On 14th January 1941 Antonescu visited Hitler again and the
latter gave him free scope to liquidate his iron-guardist rivals.
As soon is Antonescu returned to Bucharest, he took a series of
anti iron-guardist measures such as:
- To dissolve the commission for romanianasation of the enterprises
(19-th of January)
- To replace the iron-guardist Minister of Internal Affairs
- To replace the iron-guardist director of the police
- To replace all the iron-guardist prefects with military
men (20th - 21st of January)
This was the beginning of an action to remove the Iron-Guard
from power, to which the iron-guardists reacted with street
demonstrations and demands to form a purely iron-guardist government.
Sure of victory, the iron-guardists started the "rebelion"
in Bucharest on the morning of 21st of January and barricaded
themselves in the public buildings which were under their control.
They got involved in street fights with the army, naturally
devastating the Jewish district.
- The rebellion had already been defeated by the time the Germans
intervened and Horia Sima asked all the iron-guardists to put
an end to their opposition. Secretly the German army transported
about 700 iron-guardists to Germany. On 27th January a new government
was instituted, made up of almost only generals, and on 14th February
"the national iron-guardist state" was officially abrogated.
|
|
|
| top of page ▲ |
| |
|
|